API monitoring
Reachable is not the same as correct
Checkly sends a real request to your API and checks the answer: the status code, the latency, the headers, and the JSON that came back. Defined as TypeScript in your repo, tested in CI, and running from 22 global locations every ten seconds if you want it.
Trusted by teams whose APIs other people build on
“A real advantage that Checkly gives us is that we’re not waiting for our users to report an issue with a product, or waiting on a staff member to file a ticket. Checkly gives us real-time feedback on what is and isn’t working.”
Three things a ping will never tell you
Most tools sold as API monitoring send a request and look at one number. The interesting failures are all in what comes back.
A status code only proves the server answered
The endpoint returning an empty array instead of an order, or the search that quietly stopped indexing, answers 200 all day. Reachability is the cheapest property of an API and the least interesting one to watch.
Slow and down are different failures
A single timeout treats a 1.4 second checkout call as healthy right up until it crosses the line and becomes an outage. Degraded and failed are two thresholds because they deserve two responses.
The payload is the contract
Consumers do not build against your uptime, they build against your response shape. A renamed field, a null where an object used to be, a total that stopped adding up: none of that moves a status code.
“The ease of integration in our pipeline was remarkable. We have everything defined in a CI/CD pipeline using GitHub Actions using the CLI. Everything scaffolds out based on a configuration, so we just update a configuration file which specifies the environments, what services are there, what the URLs are, and from that, we just generate all the groups and their checks.”
Tobias Deekens
Principal Frontend Engineer · commercetools
Your spec already describes half the monitor
Paths, methods, headers, and query parameters are already written down. Import a Swagger 2.0 or OpenAPI spec in the check creator and pick the paths worth monitoring, or read the same JSON in a check file and generate a monitor per route so a new endpoint arrives already covered. A cURL command works too.
The API check creator: build the request, run it against production infrastructure with Run request, or import a spec.
The same idea as code. Add a route to the spec, get a monitor on the next checkly deploy.
Write it, test it, then deploy it
API monitors are TypeScript in the same repository as the API they watch. Run them locally against a branch, run them in CI before the deploy, and ship them with the same command that ships everything else.
Write the check next to the endpoint
A check file lives in the service it monitors. The pull request that changes the response shape changes the assertion in the same diff.
Run it in CI before you ship
npx checkly test runs the monitors as tests against a preview or staging environment, so a broken monitor never reaches production and neither does a broken endpoint.
Deploy monitors with the release
npx checkly deploy applies the whole project: checks, groups, alert channels, and thresholds. Monitoring never drifts from what is running.
It plugs into the stack you already run
API checks are one capability on a platform that also handles browser journeys, alerting, status pages, and root cause analysis. Results flow out through native integrations and raw webhooks.
Multistep checks
Chain requests that depend on each other and assert on the whole sequence.
Learn morePrivate locations
Run the same checks against internal services from inside your own network.
Learn moreTraces
Follow a failing request into the backend span and the database call behind it.
Learn moreAlerting
Degraded and failed route separately, after retries decide whether the spike was real.
Learn moreStatus pages
Publish per endpoint availability to the developers building on your API, on your own domain.
Learn moreRocky AI
Reads the failed run and its trace, then names the service or dependency that broke.
Learn moreMonitoring as code
Checks, groups, and alert channels as TypeScript, reviewed in pull requests.
Learn moreTerraform
Generate the estate from a service config instead of clicking it in.
Learn moreDashboards
Per endpoint latency history, including p95 and p99, in one shareable view.
Learn morePagerDuty
Incidents open and auto resolve with your existing escalation policy.
Learn morePrometheus
Check results land next to the rest of your service metrics.
Learn moreHeartbeat monitors
Catch the jobs and cron tasks that fail by not running at all.
Learn moreCovering a whole backend estate rather than a single endpoint, with chained flows, rotating credentials, and third party dependencies? That is the job this capability does on API and backend monitoring.
API teams, on Checkly
“Checkly is a fabulous developer tool! The flexible features and developer-friendly API made the integration super easy. Bonus: their support is super friendly and knowledgeable!”
Connor Hicks
Lead Developer · 1Password
“Checkly was incredibly easy to integrate. Even our initial traces setup was quick, and the documentation was better than OTel’s own.”
Brian Stack
Infrastructure Engineer · Render
“We love Heartbeat Checks! They help us ensure that critical operations run to completion and on time. We had previously evaluated other platforms just for their heartbeat checks, so we are happy to see these within Checkly along with the API and browser checks.”
Johannes Gilger
CEO & Founder · urlscan.io
“Checkly has helped us save engineering resources and expenses. The number of our customer support tickets are then reduced because the customer is already proactively informed about problems without having to report the issues themselves.”
Aliasger Kiranawala
Lead SDET · Locus
“Checkly CLI has enhanced our engineering team’s ability to quickly build, validate and deploy an entire suite of checks from their local development environment.”
Tavares Chambless
Manager, Quality Assurance · Loyal Health
“Checkly Traces helped us resolve issues faster by showing exactly how long database calls are taking. This insight was crucial in pinpointing N+1 issues and optimizing caching.”
James Hall
AWS Hero & Founder · Parallax
Key facts
API monitoring, in facts
What one API check can assert, how authenticated and multi-step flows are handled, and where the boundary of the product sits.
- What it asserts
Status, headers, latency, and response body
Assertions cover status codes, response headers, response time, and JSON or text payloads addressed with JSONPath, so a renamed field fails the check.
- Authenticated endpoints
Setup and teardown scripts
Mint a token, sign a request, or seed a record before the call, and clean up after it. Secrets come from encrypted environment variables.
- Multi-step flows
Multistep checks for sequences
Chain requests that depend on each other, such as create, read, and delete, and assert at every step rather than only the last one.
- Where checks run
22 public locations, plus private locations
Public locations show what third-party consumers experience. Private locations reach internal APIs behind a firewall.
- How checks are managed
TypeScript, Terraform, or Pulumi in Git
API checks are code: reviewed in pull requests, run locally before merge, and deployed from CI alongside the service they cover.
Checkly monitoring as code docs (opens in a new tab)Checkly CLI docs (opens in a new tab)
- What it is not
Not APM and not contract testing in CI
API monitoring runs continuously against a deployed environment. It complements code-level tracing and pre-merge contract tests rather than replacing them.
Facts checked . Vendor pricing and feature pages change without notice, so verify anything decision-critical against the linked source.
Fit check
Is API monitoring the right check for this?
Checkly is a strong fit when
- A status code is not enough and you need the response body, headers, and latency asserted on every run.
- The endpoints that matter are authenticated, or only make sense as a sequence of calls.
- You want API checks to live beside the service code and deploy through the same pipeline.
Checkly may not be the best fit when
- The failure you are chasing is inside your own code path. Distributed tracing and APM answer that better than an outside-in check.
- You only need to know whether the host is reachable. A URL or TCP monitor is the cheaper answer.
- The behaviour you want to verify only exists in a browser, such as a rendered checkout. Use a Playwright browser check.
Monitor the answer, not the pulse
Write one API check, run it from 22 locations, and find out the moment the response stops being the one your consumers build against.